President Trump was given until 6:00 p.m. Sunday to decide whether or not to have his legal team participate in the hearing, even though Democrats on the committee apparently do not know who the witnesses would be.
President Donald Trump and his lawyers will not participate in Wednesday's impeachment hearing in the House Judiciary Committee, according to a letter from the White House to the committee obtained by ABC News.
"We can not fairly be expected to participate in a hearing while the witnesses are yet to be named and while it remains unclear whether the Judiciary Committee will afford the president a fair process through additional hearings", Pat A. Cipollone, the White House counsel, wrote in a letter to Nadler.
He did not rule out participation in future hearings.
The Judiciary Committee has yet to decide on how many hearings it will have or if it will call fact witnesses.
On Tuesday, the Intelligence panel, which has taken the lead in impeachment proceedings so far, is set to vote ona formal report, also including evidence gathered by the Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees.More news: Centurion Yasir Shah reveals the longer he batted, the easier it became
The Democratic majority on the House Intelligence Committee says its report will speak for itself in laying out possible charges of bribery or "high crimes and misdemeanors", the constitutional standard for impeachment.
The White House did not say whether Mr Trump would attend a second hearing.
Now, as lawmakers return from their Thanksgiving recess, the inquiry will pivot to weighing potential articles of impeachment against Trump.
A number of Trump's allies appeared on television shows Sunday morning to aggressively condemn the process outlined by the House.
Following a court ruling that former White House counsel Don McGahn must comply with a congressional subpoena, McClintock said on "This Week" that senior officials, such as former national security adviser John Bolton and acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney should "absolutely" testify, but that he has to weigh that against the "enormous catastrophic damage" that it would do to the doctrine of executive privilege, which assures candid conversations between presidents and their advisers.
"Adam Schiff is the author of this report, he's the author of many things", Mr. Collins, Georgia Republican and top Republican on the judiciary committee, told "Fox News Sunday".More news: Chiefs sweep of Raiders all but locks up division title
Cipollone further pointed out that the opening hearing would "include no fact witnesses at all", and that neither the first nor subsequent hearings were clear about what witnesses would be called, or about what rights the president would be provided.
Ukrainian government officials said they are considering initiating investigations into the events dealing with Donald Trump's Democrat-driven impeachment. It is unclear whether the White House will cooperate in the impeachment process in any capacity until it reaches the Senate trial.
"If he has not done anything wrong, we're certainly anxious to hear his explanation of that", she added.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (Democratic-California), left, talks with ranking member Devin Nunes (Republican-California), right, during testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, November 13, 2019. A final phase would consider articles of impeachment before sending them to the House floor.
Pressed on whether impeaching Mr. Trump was written into Democrats' "playbook" from the start of this presidency, Mr. Jeffries said the House is a co-equal branch that must serve as a check on wrongdoing.More news: Underwater loudspeakers can help restore coral reef