Former President Barack Obama received considerable pushback from immigrant rights advocates and some Democrats when he expanded family detention and had to limit the length of time families were held under the 2015 court order.
As the number of children being held rose above 2,000, Trump continued to blame the Democrats for blocking a solution. Saudis begin Yemen offensive House panel rejects war authorization sunset it passed previous year MORE (D-Calif.) is asking the United Nations to probe the impact of the Trump administration's controversial "zero tolerance" immigration policy at the border.
The Trump administration has not yet offered a plan on how to address the reunifications of those families. The administration is not ending its "zero tolerance" approach to border prosecutions.
Despite Trump's order, the American Civil Liberties Union said it would press on with a lawsuit arguing the family separation policy violated the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which holds no person can be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process.
Previously, first-time offenders, who often sought asylum, were put on a legal path that left them free to come back for a hearing.More news: Melania Trump's jacket: ‘I really don't care. Do U?'
As of June 9, the three facilities had almost 2,600 of those beds occupied, according to the latest available ICE figures.
The outcry against the practice grew steadily louder.
Democrats railed against the zero-tolerance policy and visited the centers where the children were kept. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., told Trump he could change the situation with the stroke of a pen. The executive order promises only that the administration will detain alien families together "where appropriate" and where there exist "available resources", two potentially large loopholes. Hamilton also voiced support for legislation that would allow for prolonged detention of children alongside their parents.
"We never really meant to do that". "Good for the children, good for the country, good for the world". That came after the Washington Post cited an unnamed official as saying that prosecutions of parents who cross into the USA illegally would be suspended until Immigration and Customs Enforcement could "accelerate resource capacity to allow us to maintain custody".
Trump did not say how the 2,300-plus children already taken from their families would be reunited.More news: Instagram hits one billion user mark and promises long video feature
Nonetheless, it goes on to announce a "temporary detention policy" for keeping apprehended families together through court proceedings - breaking from his administration's prior choice of enforcement. The Defense Department is specifically directed to construct any facilities that may be necessary toward that end "if necessary and consistent with law". For the Pentagon, that could include building new housing. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen trekked to the Capitol to meet privately with groups of GOP lawmakers.
Lindsay Harris, a law professor at the University of the District of Columbia, said the administration could be eyeing a longer-term win at the U.S. Supreme Court, which has the power to reverse the 9th Circuit and allow for modification of the Flores settlement. "There doesn't seem to be any coherence in the Administration's planning". An official from the Department of Health and Human Services said Wednesday there would be no special efforts to reunite children already separated.
Instead, the children could be detained with their parents for extended periods. "It's a jacket", said Stephanie Grisham, Melania Trump's spokeswoman.
Trump signed the executive order following widespread protests against the move of his administration to separate children from their parents who illegally enter the country.
The order is clearly at odds with Trump's previous statements.More news: House Republicans Gear Up For Failure On Immigration
"You can't (end the separation of families at the border) through an executive order".