The five modifications included title change from Padmavati to Padmaavat as the filmmakers have attributed their creative source as the fictional poem Padmaavat and not history.
Modifications to the song "Ghoomar" were sought to make the depiction befitting to the character being portrayed, apart from modifications to the incorrect/misleading reference to historical places.
Disclaimer to make it clear that the film in no manner supports or glorify the practice of Sati.More news: Chandigarh stalking case: BJP leader's son Vikas Barala granted bail
In the case of Udta Punjab, producers Ekta Kapoor and Anurag Kashyap went to the Bombay High Court to get their film cleared (only a few minor cuts were imposed), but that's not the case with Padmavat, whose delay has already cost a significant amount to producers Viacom Motion Pictures.
The film, that was initially scheduled to release on December 1, 2017, is finally seeing the light of day this month.
"We appreciate the balanced and considered approach that the CBFC has taken to address this situation", a company spokesperson from Viacom18 Media Pvt Ltd said.
Ahead of the release of the film on 25 January, Karni Sena have started the protest on Friday in Mumbai by gheraoing the office of the CBFC, which is chaired by lyricist and scriptwriter Prasoon Joshi.More news: Doug Jones cosponsors bill to renew CHIP funding
Historians are divided on whether Padmini actually existed.
The CBFC has suggested five modifications in "Padmavati", which included changing the film's title to "Padmavat", in December a year ago.
Activists of the Rajput outfit, under the leadership of Sukhdev Singh Gogameri, gathered outside the CBFC office to express dissent over the censor board's decision to allow the release of the controversial movie. "Going by the trailer and whatever we have seen so far, Sanjay Leela Bhansali has hurt Rajput sentiments and glory".More news: FBI Boss Calls Encryption 'Major' Public Safety Threat